The curious misadventures of the Manhattan Man-whore and the Capitalist Pig

The Right Wing Conspiracy is in the NYC Blogads Network. Target a huge New York City audience with just one click!

Calendar

August 2007
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Where are Pat and Claudio?

August 11, 2005

Gaza Withdrawal

Filed under: News and Views, Syria, Terrorism, War on Terrorism — Thomas @ 1:53 pm

Hello,

Lets get to the point: Could Gaza become an Al-Qaeda stronghold? Yes And the once small Israel will now become even smaller. They gave up Sinai, Lebannon and now Gaza but the Palestinians will never be content until the day the Jews are pushed into the sea. They rage their rascist war against the Jews who have done nothing but try to settle into lands stolen from them. The Jews owned that land before the Romans, before Alexander and before the Persians. And when they lost it they always fought to get it back. Now over a millenia after the crusades they still fight for their land.

Here is a little history lesson for all you Anti-Semitic Liberals. Following WWII, the British withdrew from their control of Palestine, and the UN partitioned the area into Arab and Jewish states, an arrangement rejected by the Arabs. Notice it was the Arabs who wouldn’t share. Subsequently, the Israelis beat the Arabs down in a series of wars without ending the deep tensions between the two sides. The territories occupied by Israel since the war of 1967 are not included in the Israel country profile, unless otherwise noted. On the 25th of April 1982, Israel withdrew from the Sinai territory after the 1979 Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty. Israel and Palestinian officials signed on the 13th of September 1993 the Oslo accords creating an interim period of Palestinian self-rule. Outstanding territorial and other disputes with Jordan were resolved on the 26th of October 1994 Israel-Jordan Treaty of Peace. In addition, on the 25th of May 2000, Israel withdrew unilaterally from southern Lebanon, which it had occupied since 1982. This gave the Islamo Fascists the leverage to start persecuting Lebanese Christians.

In keeping with the framework established at the Madrid Conference in October 1991, bilateral negotiations were conducted between Israel and Palestinian representatives and Syria to achieve a permanent settlement. On the 24th of June 2002, US President George W. Bush laid out a “road map” for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which envisions a two-state solution. However, progress toward a permanent status agreement has been undermined by Palestinian-Israeli violence ongoing since September 2000. The conflict may have reached a turning point with the election in January 2005 of Mahmud Abbas as the new Palestinian leader following the November 2004 death of Yasir Arafat.

So could Gaza become an Al-Qaeda stronghold? You’re Damn Right! They would call it Hamastan; an area controlled by Hamas, the Arab version of the KKK. White garbs, hoods, the whole nine yards.


Gaza will be transformed into a base for Islamic terrorism adjacent to the coast of the State of Israel.” -Benjamin Netanyahu

“We plan to eliminate the state of Israel and establish a purely Palestinian state. We will make life unbearable for Jews by psychological warfare and population explosion. We Palestinians will take over everything, including all of Jerusalem.” -Yasser Arafat

Proud American
Proud Republican

• • •

July 18, 2005

Finally, Spaniards Con Cojones

Filed under: News and Views, Syria, Terrorism, War on Terrorism — Claudio @ 8:12 am

Spanish convicts kick Al Qaeda member’s behind in prison

From Captain’s Quarters via Ace.

Claudio

• • •

July 11, 2005

How to Defeat Terrorism by Spanish PM Zapatero

Filed under: News and Views, Iraq, Syria, Terrorism, Rants, War on Terrorism — Claudio @ 7:24 am

Spanish PM Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero (yes, let-us-pull-out-of-Iraq-and-give-the-terrorist-what-they-want Zapatero) has penned a “how-to” guide in light of the London terrorist attacks. Always open to consider an argument on the merits, I thought we here at T(v)RWC should give Zapatero’s strategy an open-minded reading.

Zapatero writes that the first step to defeating terrorists is: trying to understand them.

We must begin by making an effort to comprehend the conditions that facilitate the spread of fanaticism and support for terror. We cannot ignore conflicts that have become entrenched or the enormous economic, political and social divides in many societies, which occasionally serve as false pretexts for terrorist violence. It is unrealistic to aspire to peace and stability in a sea of universal injustice.

Sounds great! Maybe we should have one big pow-wow in which we invite the terrorist leaders to an Outward Bound activity in the woods. We can have heart-to-hearts around the campfire.

The next step in Zapatero’s brilliant strategy? Talk about it at the United Nations.

The appropriate forum to consolidate the political consensus against terrorism has to be the United Nations. The organisation must be given the means – including a legal framework and the operational tools – to lead the international fight against terrorism, enabling it to be waged more effectively.

Exactly! Because if we would just talk through our problems, and say, take advice on how to conduct this war on terror from somebody morally justified — such as, Cuba, for example, we would be on the right track! I mean, it isn’t like we’ve tried to deal with terrorism before at the United Nations and found out that we couldn’t even agree on a friggin’ DEFINITION!

The third step in Zapatero’s fail-safe strat is to sign a treaty!

On the legislative front, the adoption of a global convention against terrorism cannot wait any longer. On the operational level, we must reinforce mechanisms for co-operation among police forces, courts and intelligence services, in order to prevent new strikes and to isolate and close down terrorist organisations, as well as all those who support, fund and justify them.

Yes. Because it isn’t already illegal to conduct terrorist acts, we should have every country in a world sign a document that essentially says, “terrorism is bad!” We’ll all go and “re-affirm” our commitment to defeating this scourge, just like Chirac has recently done (and then we’ll all go home and do absolutely nothing, just like…well, Chirac has recently done).

Next, we will convince terrorists that terrorism is bad.

The fight against terrorism is also a battle for people’s minds. We must work to spread the belief that nothing can justify terrorism. No idea, no matter how legitimate it may be or may appear to be, can serve as an alibi for murder. Which is why, as a phenomenon, it is not the exclusive preserve of any one civilisation, culture or religion. For this very reason, at the UN general assembly I proposed an alliance of civilisations, based on conviction, understanding and respect for others. If we do not manage to embed in all nations the belief that tolerance is indispensable, our battle will be made all the more difficult.

Yes, yes. We will get all of Western Civilization to come together and proclaim loud and clear to the terrorist world, “You can kill us, but we will kill you with our love!” Kill ‘em with kindness.

Finally, Spanish Prime Minister Zapatero recommends that we all come together…especially Europe. In a world were terrorists need global cover in order to operate, the best thing we can do is…INTEGRATE FURTHER!

This global effort must, naturally, be complemented by regional and bilateral co-operation. In the case of Europe, it has become clear that, in view of the terrorist threat we all suffer, the European Union must offer much deeper integration: real-time interconnection of intelligence services, joint investigation teams, immediate handover of those charged with crimes, immediate enforcement throughout the Union of rulings of courts in a member state and decisive action to control the financial flows that feed terrorism. The EU must become without delay a single security area, leaving no loopholes for terrorists. We must do away with ring-fenced judicial and policing systems that criminals continue to exploit for their ends.

I mean, we could go to the countries that are producing terrorists (Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq) and deal with the problem here, but I agree that the much better idea is to sit on our behinds, wait for the next attack, and just make sure that we are really integrated and prepared to deal with the criminal investigation in the aftermath.

Right.

I like this Zapatero guy. He has all the right ideas.

Claudio

• • •

Powered by: WordPress • Template by: Priss